
U.S. Representative for Wisconsin’s 5th district
Republican
119th Congress, two-year term
Missed 1.2% of roll calls. Chamber median 1.9%.
The full voting recordCounts roll calls where most Democrats and most Republicans voted differently, leaving out procedural votes.
How we countFrom FEC filings, Voteview roll calls and Congress.gov.
Republican. In Congress since 2021, 3 terms in total.
Following saves Fitzgerald to your list, which Chamber & Street keeps on its server, linked to a cookie on this browser and not to your name or email. Email alerts will come with constituent verification.
Bills and resolutions where Fitzgerald is the primary sponsor. Most bills never leave committee; that is normal for every member. Source: Congress.gov, last updated Oct 29, 2026.
8 of 32 have at least one cosponsor from the other party.
Stopping Overdoses of Fentanyl Analogues Act
Introduced Feb 6, 2025. 0 cosponsors. H.R. 1064 on Congress.gov
Introduced
Stopping Overdoses of Fentanyl Analogues Act
This bill permanently adds fentanyl-related substances to schedule I of the Controlled Substances Act. (A schedule I controlled substance is a drug, substance, or chemical that has a high potential for abuse; has no currently accepted medical value; and is subject to regulatory controls and administrative, civil, and criminal penalties under the Controlled Substances Act.)
Fentanyl-related substances are currently regulated under schedule I through a temporary order issued by the Drug Enforcement Administration. The temporary order expires March 31, 2025.
Interstate Commerce Simplification Act of 2025
Introduced Jan 15, 2025. 3 cosponsors. H.R. 427 on Congress.gov(opens in a new tab)
Introduced
Interstate Commerce Simplification Act of 2025
This bill expands the definition of solicitation of orders to include business activities that serve an independently valuable business function apart from the solicitation of orders for purposes of the limitation on a state’s authority to impose a net income tax on an out-of-state seller.
Under current law, a state is prohibited from imposing a net income tax on income derived from within the state from interstate commerce if the only business activity within the state is the solicitation of orders for the sale of tangible personal property, provided that the orders are approved (or rejected) and filled by shipment or delivery from outside of the state. Further, the Supreme Court has held that the term solicitation of orders includes (1) activities that are strictly essential to making requests for purchases, and (2) ancillary activities that serve no independent business function apart from their connection to requests for purchases.
Under the bill, the definition of solicitation of orders is expanded to include business activities that facilitate the solicitation of orders even if such business activities serve an independently valuable business function apart from the solicitation.