Tariffs and trade
143 bills and resolutions in the 119th Congress. 21 passed a chamber; 3 became law.
How did your members vote on this?
H.R. 4427 Syria Sanctions Accountability Act of 2025
Passed committee
Sponsor Michael Lawler (R). 0 cosponsors. Introduced Jul 16, 2025. Matched on the CRS subject Trade restrictions.
H.R. 5247 To provide for the International Security Affairs authorities of the Department of State.
Passed committee
Sponsor Keith Self (R). 0 cosponsors. Introduced Sep 10, 2025. Matched on the CRS subject Trade restrictions.
H.R. 1674 Keep Americans Safe Act
Introduced
Sponsor Diana DeGette (D). 145 cosponsors. Introduced Feb 27, 2025. Matched on the CRS subject Trade restrictions.
H.R. 1674 on Congress.gov(opens in a new tab)Summary by the Congressional Research Service
Keep Americans Safe Act
This bill establishes a new criminal offense for the import, sale, manufacture, transfer, or possession of a large capacity ammunition feeding device (LCAFD).
The bill does not prohibit certain conduct with respect to an LCAFD, including the following:
• importation, sale, manufacture, transfer, or possession related to certain law enforcement efforts, or authorized tests or experiments;
• importation, sale, transfer, or possession related to securing nuclear materials; and
• possession by a retired law enforcement officer.
The bill permits continued possession of, but prohibits sale or transfer of, a grandfathered LCAFD.
Newly manufactured LCAFDs must display serial number identification and the date of manufacture.
Additionally, the bill allows a state or local government to use Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program funds to compensate individuals who surrender an LCAFD under a buy-back program.
H.R. 1548 Leveling the Playing Field 2.0 Act
Introduced
Sponsor Beth Van Duyne (R). 103 cosponsors. Introduced Feb 24, 2025. Matched on the CRS subject Tariffs.
H.R. 1548 on Congress.gov(opens in a new tab)Summary by the Congressional Research Service
Leveling the Playing Field 2.0 Act
This bill addresses unfair trade practices by making various changes to U.S. antidumping and countervailing duty laws. Antidumping laws provide relief to U.S industries and workers that are materially injured or threatened with injury due to imports of like products sold in the U.S. market at less than fair value, while countervailing duty laws provide such relief from imports of products subsidized by a foreign government or public entity.
Specifically, the bill establishes a process for successive antidumping and countervailing duty investigations. Successive investigations may be concurrent (an ongoing investigation of the same product) or recently completed (not more than two years before the date of the initiation of the successive investigation). Further, the bill establishes a timeline for the Department of Commerce to issue determinations in successive investigations.
Among other provisions, the bill authorizes Commerce to
• apply countervailing duty law to subsidies provided by a foreign government or public entity to a company operating in a different country,
• use another method for calculating the cost of production in specific circumstances, and
• require importers to certify that the imported merchandise is not subject to an antidumping or countervailing duty order.
Additionally, the bill statutorily establishes procedures for Commerce to conduct circumvention inquiries, including by specifying the deadlines for preliminary and final determinations.
The bill also provides statutory authority for Commerce to investigate currency undervaluation as a countervailable subsidy.
H.R. 407 Prevent Tariff Abuse Act
Introduced
Sponsor Suzan DelBene (D). 75 cosponsors. Introduced Jan 15, 2025. Matched on the CRS subjects Tariffs; Trade restrictions.
H.R. 407 on Congress.gov(opens in a new tab)Summary by the Congressional Research Service
Prevent Tariff Abuse Act
This bill prohibits the President from exercising authorities under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose duties, tariff-rate quotas, or other quotas on imports entering the United States. (IEEPA provides the President with broad authority to regulate various economic transactions following a declaration of a national emergency.)
H.R. 381 LNG Public Interest Determination Act of 2025
Introduced
Sponsor Sean Casten (D). 48 cosponsors. Introduced Jan 14, 2025. Matched on the CRS subject Trade restrictions.
H.R. 381 on Congress.gov(opens in a new tab)Summary by the Congressional Research Service
LNG Public Interest Determination Act of 2025
This bill modifies and expands requirements for exporting natural gas, including liquefied natural gas (LNG).
Under the existing provisions of the Natural Gas Act, exporters of natural gas must obtain authorization to make such exports from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). Additionally, FERC must authorize such exports if they are consistent with the public interest.
The bill directs exporters of natural gas to obtain authorization from the Department of Energy (DOE) rather than from FERC. Before granting an authorization, DOE must determine that the export would not likely (1) contribute significantly to climate change; (2) materially increase energy prices or energy price volatility for U.S. consumers; or (3) create a disproportionate health or environmental burden on rural, low-income, minority, and other vulnerable communities.
The bill also classifies an authorization of the exportation of natural gas as a major federal action that triggers the environmental review process required under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA).
Additionally, the bill terminates the categorical exclusion for exports of natural gas, and any associated transportation of LNG by marine vessels, from NEPA environmental review requirements. A categorical exclusion is a class of actions that a federal agency has determined do not significantly affect the quality of the human environment and, thus, do not require either an environmental assessment nor an environmental impact statement.
H.R. 3306 Truth in Tariffs Act
Introduced
Sponsor Jamie Raskin (D). 33 cosponsors. Introduced May 8, 2025. Matched on its title.
S. 5390 End Trump’s Tariff Tax Act
Introduced
Sponsor Charles Schumer (D). 29 cosponsors. Introduced Sep 14, 2026. Matched on its title.
H.R. 923 Stop Arming Cartels Act of 2025
Introduced
Sponsor Joaquin Castro (D). 27 cosponsors. Introduced Feb 4, 2025. Matched on the CRS subject Trade restrictions.
H.R. 923 on Congress.gov(opens in a new tab)Summary by the Congressional Research Service
Stop Arming Cartels Act of 2025
This bill expands the regulation of .50 caliber rifles under federal firearms laws and authorizes new civil remedies for certain violations.
Firearms that are trafficked from the United States to Mexico are often routed to transnational criminal organizations (TCOs), including cartels. In recent years, TCOs increasingly use .50 caliber rifles in attacks on Mexican security forces.
In 2025, in Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. v. Estados Unidos Mexicanos, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) bars a civil lawsuit by Mexico against U.S. firearms manufacturers and one U.S. firearms distributor for costs associated with gun violence in Mexico. (The PLCAA limits the civil liability of firearms manufacturers and sellers for damages resulting from the criminal or unlawful misuse of firearms.)
This bill generally criminalizes the import, sale, manufacture, transfer, and possession of .50 caliber rifles under the Gun Control Act and subjects .50 caliber rifles to regulation (i.e., registration and licensing requirements) under the National Firearms Act.
Additionally, the bill criminalizes the sale or transfer of firearms and ammunition to foreign individuals or entities designated as significant foreign narcotics traffickers or as part of their networks and sanctioned under the Foreign Narcotics Kingpin Designation Act (Kingpin Act).
Finally, the bill creates an exception under the PLCAA to allow civil lawsuits against firearms manufacturers or sellers that knowingly sell or transfer a firearm or ammunition to a foreign individual or entity designated and sanctioned under the Kingpin Act.
H.R. 3986 Small Business Liberation Act
Introduced
Sponsor Kelly Morrison (D). 26 cosponsors. Introduced Jun 12, 2025. Matched on the CRS subject Tariffs.
S. 3905 Tariff Refund Act of 2026
Introduced
Sponsor Ron Wyden (D). 26 cosponsors. Introduced Feb 24, 2026. Matched on its title.
S. 803 Keep Americans Safe Act
Introduced
Sponsor Mazie Hirono (D). 24 cosponsors. Introduced Feb 27, 2025. Matched on the CRS subject Trade restrictions.
S. 803 on Congress.gov(opens in a new tab)Summary by the Congressional Research Service
Keep Americans Safe Act
This bill establishes a new criminal offense for the import, sale, manufacture, transfer, or possession of a large capacity ammunition feeding device (LCAFD).
The bill does not prohibit certain conduct with respect to an LCAFD, including the following:
• importation, sale, manufacture, transfer, or possession related to certain law enforcement efforts, or authorized tests or experiments;
• importation, sale, transfer, or possession related to securing nuclear materials; and
• possession by a retired law enforcement officer.
The bill permits continued possession of, but prohibits sale or transfer of, a grandfathered LCAFD.
Newly manufactured LCAFDs must display serial number identification and the date of manufacture.
Additionally, the bill allows a state or local government to use Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program funds to compensate individuals who surrender an LCAFD under a buy-back program.
S. 691 Leveling the Playing Field 2.0 Act
Introduced
Sponsor Todd Young (R). 23 cosponsors. Introduced Feb 24, 2025. Matched on the CRS subject Tariffs.
S. 691 on Congress.gov(opens in a new tab)Summary by the Congressional Research Service
Leveling the Playing Field 2.0 Act
This bill addresses unfair trade practices by making various changes to U.S. antidumping and countervailing duty laws. Antidumping laws provide relief to U.S industries and workers that are materially injured or threatened with injury due to imports of like products sold in the U.S. market at less than fair value, while countervailing duty laws provide such relief from imports of products subsidized by a foreign government or public entity.
Specifically, the bill establishes a process for successive antidumping and countervailing duty investigations. Successive investigations may be concurrent (an ongoing investigation of the same product) or recently completed (not more than two years before the date of the initiation of the successive investigation). Further, the bill establishes a timeline for the Department of Commerce to issue determinations in successive investigations.
Among other provisions, the bill authorizes Commerce to
• apply countervailing duty law to subsidies provided by a foreign government or public entity to a company operating in a different country,
• use another method for calculating the cost of production in specific circumstances, and
• require importers to certify that the imported merchandise is not subject to an antidumping or countervailing duty order.
Additionally, the bill statutorily establishes procedures for Commerce to conduct circumvention inquiries, including by specifying the deadlines for preliminary and final determinations.
The bill also provides statutory authority for Commerce to investigate currency undervaluation as a countervailable subsidy.
S. 1705 Chip Security Act
Introduced
Sponsor Tom Cotton (R). 21 cosponsors. Introduced May 8, 2025. Matched on the CRS subject Trade restrictions.
S. 1705 on Congress.gov(opens in a new tab)Summary by the Congressional Research Service
Chip Security Act
This bill requires covered integrated circuit products (e.g., advanced computing chips) to incorporate certain security mechanisms.
Specifically, the bill directs the Department of Commerce to require any covered integrated circuit product to have chip security mechanisms that implement location verification before the product is exported, reexported, or in-country transferred to or in a foreign country.
Commerce must require any person that has received a license or other authorization under the Export Control Reform Act of 2018 to export, reexport, or in-country transfer a covered product to promptly report to Commerce's Bureau of Industry and Security if the person obtains credible information that the product has been diverted away from its intended location or has been subjected to tampering.
Commerce must, in coordination with the Department of Defense (DOD), conduct an assessment and report to Congress on whether additional chip security mechanisms should be adopted. If Commerce determines additional security measures are necessary, then Commerce must require any covered product to include the secondary chip security mechanisms before the product is exported, reexported, or in-country transferred to or in a foreign country.
The bill authorizes Commerce to take certain enforcement actions, such as verifying the ownership and location of a covered product that has been exported, reexported, or in-country transferred to or in a foreign country.
Commerce must coordinate with DOD, within two years of the bill's enactment and annually thereafter for three years, to assess new chip security mechanisms and report to Congress.
S. 1593 Small Business Liberation Act
Introduced
Sponsor Edward Markey (D). 18 cosponsors. Introduced May 5, 2025. Matched on the CRS subject Tariffs.
S. 959 Tariff Transparency Act of 2025
Introduced
Sponsor Angela Alsobrooks (D). 18 cosponsors. Introduced Mar 11, 2025. Matched on its title.
S. 959 on Congress.gov(opens in a new tab)Summary by the Congressional Research Service
Tariff Transparency Act of 2025
This bill requires the U.S. International Trade Commission to investigate and report to Congress on the impact of additional tariffs on imports from Canada and Mexico. (President Donald J. Trump issued executive orders on February 1, 2025, to impose an additional 25% tariff on most imports from Canada and Mexico. These tariffs applied to all imports, except for Canadian energy or energy resources, which have an additional 10% tariff.)
Specifically, the report must assess (1) the impact of these tariffs on consumer prices; (2) the impact of any retaliation (e.g., retaliatory tariffs and export restrictions) imposed by Canada and Mexico on U.S. consumers, small businesses, farmers, and ranchers; and (3) the impact of the threat of tariffs and associated uncertainty with respect to the trade relationship between the United States, Canada, and Mexico on U.S. businesses.
H.R. 1625 Haiti Economic Lift Program Extension Act of 2025
Introduced
Sponsor Gregory Murphy (R). 17 cosponsors. Introduced Feb 26, 2025. Matched on the CRS subject Tariffs.
H.R. 1625 on Congress.gov(opens in a new tab)Summary by the Congressional Research Service
Haiti Economic Lift Program Extension Act of 2025
This bill extends through FY2035 the special duty-free rules for various apparel products imported from Haiti, including the duty-free treatment provided for a limited amount (referred to as tariff preference levels) of certain apparel products assembled in and imported from Haiti.
The bill directs the President to proclaim such modifications to the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTS) that may be necessary to restore preferential treatment to articles that became ineligible for such treatment due to prior revisions to the HTS.
H.R. 2464 Repealing Outdated and Unilateral Tariff Authorities Act
Introduced
Sponsor Bradley Schneider (D). 17 cosponsors. Introduced Mar 27, 2025. Matched on its title.
H.R. 2464 on Congress.gov(opens in a new tab)Summary by the Congressional Research Service
Repealing Outdated and Unilateral Tariff Authorities Act
This bill repeals the statute that directs the President to impose new or additional tariffs on articles produced by, or imported on the vessels of, foreign countries that discriminate against U.S. commerce.
H.R. 7380 IRAN Act
Introduced
17 cosponsors. Matched on the CRS subject Trade restrictions.
S. 367 Stop Arming Cartels Act of 2025
Introduced
Sponsor Richard Durbin (D). 16 cosponsors. Introduced Feb 3, 2025. Matched on the CRS subject Trade restrictions.
S. 367 on Congress.gov(opens in a new tab)Summary by the Congressional Research Service
Stop Arming Cartels Act of 2025
This bill expands the regulation of .50 caliber rifles under federal firearms laws and authorizes new civil remedies for certain violations.
Firearms that are trafficked from the United States to Mexico are often routed to transnational criminal organizations (TCOs), including cartels. In recent years, TCOs increasingly use .50 caliber rifles in attacks on Mexican security forces.
In 2025, in Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. v. Estados Unidos Mexicanos, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) bars a civil lawsuit by Mexico against U.S. firearms manufacturers and one U.S. firearms distributor for costs associated with gun violence in Mexico. (The PLCAA limits the civil liability of firearms manufacturers and sellers for damages resulting from the criminal or unlawful misuse of firearms.)
This bill generally criminalizes the import, sale, manufacture, transfer, and possession of .50 caliber rifles under the Gun Control Act and subjects .50 caliber rifles to regulation (i.e., registration and licensing requirements) under the National Firearms Act.
Additionally, the bill criminalizes the sale or transfer of firearms and ammunition to foreign individuals or entities designated as significant foreign narcotics traffickers or as part of their networks and sanctioned under the Foreign Narcotics Kingpin Designation Act (Kingpin Act).
Finally, the bill creates an exception under the PLCAA to allow civil lawsuits against firearms manufacturers or sellers that knowingly sell or transfer a firearm or ammunition to a foreign individual or entity designated and sanctioned under the Kingpin Act.
H.R. 595 To amend the Convention on Cultural Property Implementation Act to make certain technical corrections to facilitate the lawful trade and collecting of numismatic materials.
Introduced
Sponsor Beth Van Duyne (R). 15 cosponsors. Introduced Jan 21, 2025. Matched on the CRS subject Trade restrictions.
H.R. 595 on Congress.gov(opens in a new tab)Summary by the Congressional Research Service
This bill revises the standard for providing satisfactory evidence to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) regarding the importation of numismatic material (i.e., coins, tokens, paper money, medals, and related objects) into the United States.
Current law generally prohibits the importation of designated archaeological or ethnological material that is exported from certain countries that are a party to the 1970 UNESCO Convention on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property. Importation is allowed if the country issues a certification or other documentation certifying the exportation was not in violation of the country's laws. The United States implements its obligations through the Convention on Cultural Property Implementation Act.
Under current law, CBP must seize imports of designated archaeological or ethnological material unless the importer establishes by certain documentation or satisfactory evidence that the material is admissible into the United States.
This bill specifies the standard for satisfactory evidence with respect to numismatic material. Specifically, the bill allows for the import of numismatic material with evidence that the numismatic material was acquired and exported lawfully, is of a known type, and is not known to be the direct product of illicit excavations within certain countries after the effective date for any import restrictions on such material.
The bill prohibits CBP, when reviewing satisfactory evidence, from requiring other documentation unless there is probable cause to believe the presented evidence is false or fraudulent.
H.R. 2047 Pink Tariffs Study Act
Introduced
Sponsor Lizzie Fletcher (D). 12 cosponsors. Introduced Mar 11, 2025. Matched on its title.
H.R. 2047 on Congress.gov(opens in a new tab)Summary by the Congressional Research Service
Pink Tariffs Study Act
This bill requires the Department of the Treasury to study and report to Congress on whether the U.S. tariff system is regressive (e.g., tariffs are higher on mass-market consumer goods compared to analogous luxury goods) or demonstrates a gender bias (e.g., tariffs are higher on women's clothing compared to men's clothing).
For this study and report, Treasury must (1) coordinate with U.S. Customs and Border Protection, and (2) consult with the U.S. International Trade Commission and the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative.
S. 4281 Multilateral Alignment of Technology Controls on Hardware (MATCH) Act
Introduced
Sponsor Pete Ricketts (R). 11 cosponsors. Introduced Apr 13, 2026. Matched on the CRS subject Trade restrictions.
H.R. 735 United States Reciprocal Trade Act
Introduced
Sponsor Riley Moore (R). 10 cosponsors. Introduced Jan 24, 2025. Matched on the CRS subjects Tariffs; Trade restrictions.
H.R. 735 on Congress.gov(opens in a new tab)Summary by the Congressional Research Service
United States Reciprocal Trade Act
This bill expands presidential trade authorities.
The bill allows the President, in certain circumstances, to (1) negotiate with a foreign country for tariff reductions on exported U.S. goods, or (2) impose additional duties on imported goods. Specifically, the President may take these actions if it is determined that the country (1) when importing a good from the United States, applies a higher rate of duty on that good than the rate imposed by the United States when the good is imported from that country; or (2) similarly imposes other, nontariff trade restrictions on that good. This authority shall be effective for three years, subject to a three-year renewal.
The President must terminate a rate of duty increase under this bill if the country no longer applies such higher rates or nontariff trade restrictions, or if the higher rate is no longer in the interest of the United States.
The bill also requires the President to consult with and notify Congress regarding the intention of the President to increase a rate of duty on imported goods.
Congress may nullify a rate of duty increase implemented under this bill through a joint resolution of disapproval.
S. 4456 AI OVERWATCH Act
Introduced
Sponsor Jim Banks (R). 10 cosponsors. Introduced Apr 30, 2026. Matched on the CRS subject Trade restrictions.